Facility decisions represent some of the largest investments schools will ever make, yet many educational leaders approach these choices based on emotion, immediate pressure, or gut instinct rather than enrollment data. This approach leads to expensive mistakes—schools that overextend financially, outgrow their solutions too quickly, or commit to spaces that don’t align with their actual growth patterns.
The solution requires discipline: let enrollment data drive facility decisions. By understanding your enrollment patterns, projections, and key metrics, schools can make facility choices that support sustainable growth while protecting their financial stability.
Understanding Your Enrollment Reality
Before making facility decisions—whether lease renewal, expansion, or property purchase—schools need a clear picture of their enrollment reality beyond current student count.
Historical Pattern Analysis
Analyze at least 5-10 years of enrollment data if available. Look for patterns in growth, stability, and attrition. Pay attention to grade-level trends. Do you consistently see drops from 6th to 7th grade? Are kindergarten classes growing while middle school grades remain stable? These patterns reveal crucial information about facility needs.
Some schools discover natural enrollment breaks at certain grade levels, often due to program transitions or when families choose different educational paths. Understanding these patterns helps predict future space needs more accurately than assuming linear growth across all grades.
Community Context
Research demographic changes and housing developments in your area. Is your community growing or declining? Are birth rates increasing or decreasing? New housing developments, major employers relocating to your area, or significant economic changes all impact enrollment projections.
We’ve worked with schools where new processing plants brought job growth to the area, creating enrollment opportunities that weren’t immediately obvious from historical data. Conversely, some schools face challenges when major employers leave their regions, affecting family stability and enrollment retention.

Waitlist Reality Check
Many schools point to waitlists as evidence of facility demand, but waitlist depth alone doesn’t tell the complete story. The critical metric is waitlist conversion rate. We’ve seen schools with impressive waitlists discover that when spots actually open, families often don’t convert to enrollment.
Track not just waitlist size, but actual conversion rates when spots become available. A smaller, highly-converting waitlist often indicates stronger demand than a large list with poor conversion.
Key Enrollment Metrics for Facility Decisions
1. Average Daily Attendance (ADA) Targets
The most important metric for facility planning is achieving about 80% of your target ADA consistently. If you’re targeting 500 ADA, having 400 or more students in seats daily puts you in strong financial position for facility investments.
ADA differs from enrollment because it accounts for actual attendance patterns. Some schools enroll 500 students but average only 450 in daily attendance due to chronic absenteeism or other factors. For facility planning, ADA provides a more realistic picture of your operational capacity needs.
2. Multi-Year Consistency
Single-year enrollment success doesn’t provide sufficient foundation for major facility decisions. Look for 3-5 years of meeting enrollment targets consistently. Occasional blips aren’t disqualifying, but you want evidence of sustained enrollment health before committing to significant facility investments.
3. Grade-Level Distribution
Understanding enrollment distribution across grades helps predict facility needs. Elementary-heavy schools need different space configurations than middle school-focused institutions. Some schools discover their enrollment is heavily weighted toward certain grade bands, affecting everything from bathroom ratios to classroom sizes.
Strategic Timing for Facility Investments
The Two-Year Rule
Start facility planning at least two years before you need the space. This timeline accounts for the reality that everything takes longer than expected—finding suitable space, securing financing, navigating permitting processes, and completing improvements.
This extended timeline also allows for facility improvements while you’re still in your current location, enabling transitions during natural break periods like summer rather than disrupting the school year.
Enrollment Stability Requirements
Facility investments should only be considered when you’re either at capacity with strong waitlists or maintaining consistent enrollment at target levels. Making facility decisions during enrollment decline or instability often leads to overextension and financial stress.

Moving Forward with Confidence
Enrollment-informed facility planning isn’t about eliminating all risk—it’s about making decisions based on data rather than emotion or external pressure. Schools that align facility decisions with enrollment reality position themselves for sustainable growth while protecting their financial stability and educational mission.
The key is patience and discipline. Wait for enrollment stability before major facility commitments. Invest in data collection and analysis. Partner with professionals who understand both enrollment and facility planning. Most importantly, remember that facility decisions should enhance your educational mission, not compromise it. When enrollment data drives facility decisions, schools make investments that support long-term success rather than create financial strain. This approach may require more time and analysis upfront, but it results in facility solutions that truly serve your school community for years to come.
About the Author

Ashley MacQuarrie has years of experience in education and the digital marketing industry, having gained classroom experience before managing content and social media teams, developing websites, and consulting for startups and large brands. Ashley now leads the Grow Schools Marketing Team and the Enrollment Marketing team.